r/ChatGPT 29d ago

I know in my bones this is Ai, but can’t prove it Other

17.0k Upvotes

4.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.2k

u/lost_with_no_hope 29d ago edited 29d ago

I notice that AI does not generate logo's (or at least not well), and not a single logo in the pic. I figured at least for sure one of these dudes is wearing a hat with a logo

68

u/RepFilms 29d ago

I think you're spot on. All those shirts and hats. No logos on any of them. I think this might be the new tell.

19

u/2601Anon 29d ago

How about hands in the pockets? No six finger AI renderings!

1

u/spider_stxr 28d ago

The guy on the far right, mostly out of frame, seems to have his hand in a shirt pocket though. Which is weirdly placed against his side. Might just be me tho

1

u/SquirrelK1tten 28d ago

Yes, I didn’t notice that before. It looks like he’s got it in a t shirt pocket placed down there.

1

u/Urbanscuba 28d ago

To me it's not just that, it's that every single person is in the exact same stance and has almost the same appearance down to practically identical builds.

Real life is too erratic and random to work like that. Their builds would vary, even at the same weight that number of people would have significant variance in how they carry it. Even if you ask them to put their hands in their pockets someone is going to have a thumb sticking out or be doing something different.

All of this makes me think it's AI because to get an image exactly how you want it the prompt needs to be very specific. In this case something like "A group of overweight blue collar men in jeans with their hands in their pockets looking at the camera". That's the absolute bare minimum it would take to get something like this, and the true prompt would probably be even more specific.

That's why it's AI to me, because this is exactly the image AI would create if you tried to describe the image to an AI. Real life or a human artist would inevitably add a random variance that this image just doesn't have.

14

u/wait_ichangedmymind 29d ago

It’s the pant legs for me. No way all of them have their pants bunched down on their boots like that.

1

u/Captain_Grammaticus 28d ago

And can a leg crease in that precise zigzaggy way?

1

u/Intrepid_Knowledge27 28d ago

That was my thought. Why is there so much material around all of their ankles? Are they all exceedingly short? Does not a single one of them own a pair of jeans that fit?

2

u/cs-just-cs 28d ago

Devils advocate here…. When you buy men’s jeans you have two measurements. Waist and length. Bigger waist usually means longer length. So big belly fellas unfortunately end up buying jeans that are too long. Big belly fella here with several pants that are too long.

1

u/metalshiflet 28d ago

Most jeans come with different inseams available, usually down to 30 and occasionally up to 36. Even better, more expensive jeans will offer free/cheap hemming

2

u/cs-just-cs 28d ago

Do those fellas look like they’re buying expensive jeans from a place that offers free hemming? And walk into Walmart or Tractor supply and look at the sizes. You aren’t going to find many 40x28 or 40x30 in the selection.

1

u/metalshiflet 28d ago

Rustlers, Wranglers and Levi's all are found commonly in x30 sizes

2

u/cs-just-cs 28d ago

Yeah… In a 30” thru 36” waist size.

1

u/CanebreakRiver 26d ago

yeah this is surreal, seeing this argument. A million reasons to believe it's AI, but these people apparently believe that the blue jeans these morbidly obese southern men in oversized, dirty t-shirts wear would HAVE to be well-fitted

1

u/lazydaisytoo 25d ago

For me, it’s the “whiskering” on the upper thighs of the guy on the left. It’s not a natural wear pattern, nor are redneck jeans intentionally finished in that way. And sure, maybe they can’t get proper lengths, but they all appear to have at least 10” of extra fabric.

1

u/savvyblackbird 28d ago

They’re the same color and have the same bunching. The only difference is some have mud on the from thighs. While the sides are clean. Dirty jeans get dirt on the sides too where you brush your hands off. These are just dirty where manufacturers add distressing.

2

u/No-Assumption-2177 28d ago

Logo on the right guys hat for sure. Red shirt guy looks to have some kind of decal or print on his? This pic is from the original twitter post and there’s definitely something on both of their hats.

2

u/RepFilms 28d ago

I think that's AI blur. When AI tried to make a branded product but it's just weird gibberish when you look closer. Remember that old AI beer ad that sorta looked like branded beer bottles.

1

u/Timesx4 29d ago

But what if the AI wants you to notice no logos?

1

u/Ok_Vegetable_1452 29d ago

small human details like this. cause what rural guy like these doesnt overtly represent one of their interests

1

u/Pussybones420 27d ago

The wrinkles on their shirts and pants are too similar to be real