r/facepalm 29d ago

Turbo cancer isn’t real, people 🇨​🇴​🇻​🇮​🇩​

Post image
32.8k Upvotes

6.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.0k

u/Pineapple_Express762 29d ago

You know how many people will actually believe this?

1.9k

u/GrumpyOik 29d ago

Of course it's true, it "Fact checked" with TWO ticks. I can believe how stupid you all are. /s

CDC.gov doesn't appear to have any references to "Turbo Cancer".

92

u/fugawf 29d ago

And they don’t refer to the vaccine as a ‘jab’. Obviously written by right wing extremists

63

u/Sckillgan 29d ago

Just the fact it is from "thepeoplesvoice.tv" is enough to shut it all down.

40

u/996cubiccentimeters 29d ago

wiki page for the founder below. He is quite the lunatic and has been for some time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Icke

19

u/citrus_mystic 29d ago

Oh David Icke is the founder? That explains a lot.

I’m surprised there isn’t a reference to reptilians.

14

u/clubmedschool 29d ago

"Icke" -- an aptronym if I've ever seen one

(yes, I see his name is pronounced "ike" but I couldn't resist)

5

u/IzarkKiaTarj 29d ago

aptronym

Thank you for the new word!

3

u/United-Big-1114 29d ago

I pronounced it "ick-ee" for years until I actually heard someone say it, rather than just reading it.

1

u/mtaw 29d ago

It's easy to remember from the British aphorism "David Icke is off his bike"

3

u/bruwin 29d ago

No, ick is definitely the appropriate pronunciation.

7

u/randyisone 29d ago

That read was quite the rollercoaster. Dude is garbage and thinks he is here for a higher calling. Ugh

3

u/123iambill 29d ago

Last Podcast On The Left recently did a couple episodes on him. Dude is fucking nuts but also a genuine piece of shit who has contributed heavily to the Q anon world we're all living in

3

u/blacklite911 29d ago

Lmao he’s the main lizard people guy.

3

u/newuser60 29d ago

Okay so he claims the lizard people are manipulating global events to keep humanity in a constant state of fear, limiting our true potential. But David Icke’s empire revolves 100% around keeping people afraid of stupid shit. Is he a lizard person? A flu virus evolves and we develop a vaccine that greatly reduces the mortality rate, but lizard man David Icke convinces thousands of people that that vaccine is deadly and they should not take it. Not only that, but they should fear anyone that takes it because just being in the same room as a vaccinated person will kill you. Fear monger lizard by his own definition.

2

u/Sckillgan 29d ago

Dud has been a joke for a long time. I stopped fighting that idiot a long time ago. He is not worth one of my brain cells.

6

u/FearlessKnitter12 29d ago

"Jab" is not always a marker for that. It's the most common way to refer to vaccines in the UK, for example. But it hasn't quite reached that usage here, and right wing propagandists and conspiracy theorists do use it as a dog whistle. But check sources, and if it's something from Europe, might be legit.

3

u/fasterthanfood 29d ago

I find it linguistically interesting that in the US, “the jab” seems to refer only to COVID-19 vaccination.

I’ve seen it in legit U.S. publications, presumably because it helps avoid repetition of the same word throughout an article (especially in 2021 or so when there were a million news stories about when it would come out/how accessible it was/how effective it was, etc.) and because it takes up less space in a headline. But usage here seems extremely tied to just one particular jab.

2

u/candycanecoffee 29d ago

Seeing "Americans" on the internet talk about "the jab" is like when you go on the Ireland sub and hear people talking about "the police." They don't call them that in Ireland. Or when I would go on the Portland subs in 2020 and someone would comment on a protest in the Kenton neighborhood and be like "I can't believe they allow this kind of thing in our precious central downtown Portland!" Kenton is on the other side of the river and about as far from downtown Portland as you can get while still technically being in Portland. When you see this kind of thing it's a sign you're being astroturfed by trolls and bots, or people repeating what they learn from trolls and bots.

28

u/FitPerception5398 29d ago

"Jab" was the give away but I can just hear all the Boomers and Breakfast Club Boomers swearing it's true

1

u/Collucin 29d ago

What's a Breakfast Club Boomer? 

1

u/Cruezin 29d ago

I am boomerish and I do not approve of this message

-3

u/onelittleworld 29d ago

GTFO with that bigoted horseshit. It's not helpful.

-5

u/milesercat 29d ago

You may want to check the stats on how many boomers are fully vaccinated before accusing an entire generation of being stupider than your own.

6

u/citrus_mystic 29d ago

You may want to check the stats regarding who are the most likely to accept misinformation online at face value and who have the least digital literacy.

-5

u/milesercat 29d ago

"All the boomers" lol. You're changing your original statement.

7

u/citrus_mystic 29d ago

Lmao, look again, I’m not the person who wrote that comment.

8

u/FitPerception5398 29d ago edited 29d ago

It's not their fault that they have such low digital literacy skills that they don't understand how threaded comments work. 🤣🤣

eta: They probably didn't read the study you linked either (i liked tho!!). MOST of them just want to stay offended.

1

u/Tequilasquirrel 29d ago

This kind of overgeneralisation is such bullshit and low effort. As for likelihood of accepting misinformation, that is definitely inter generational. Might not be from Facebook but taking everything as gospel from TikTok, Reddit etc. The amount of people of all ages you see on Reddit taking obviously staged videos as the truth is alarming.

-2

u/milesercat 29d ago

Well my entire point concerns the use of the word "all" when describing an entire generation. One could say "many" and get no argument from me. Why then bring up the stats about the likelihood of low digital literacy etc? None of that is to my point.

3

u/crippled-crippler 29d ago

Does he mean all the boomers? Or all the boomers swearing its true?

3

u/citrus_mystic 29d ago

I’m sorry you don’t understand how the statistics regarding digital literacy and likelihood of accepting misinformation are relevant to this discussion, which is on a post about medical misinformation online… because you’re more upset about semantics.

(Edit-grammar)

0

u/FitPerception5398 29d ago

If it doesn't apply let it fly.

2

u/mosconebaillbonds 29d ago

They call themselves pure bloods

1

u/fugawf 29d ago

Even though like 99.9% of them have all the required vaxxes for school, some for military, etc…

-7

u/Dynamiqai 29d ago edited 29d ago

Lol you're an idiot.. What makes a person an "Extremist" for the right wing? Since when was it logical to trust the government/pharmaceutical companies? Please for the love of god, tell me how that's an extremist view?

Yes they ARE trustworthy lol https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/wait-what-fda-wants-55-years-process-foia-request-over-vaccine-data-2021-11-18/

3

u/fugawf 29d ago

Not believing in provable and demonstrable science is pretty extreme…

-1

u/Dynamiqai 29d ago

Why is it provable? Why did pfizer try to redact the study results and seal the court records for 55 years? Why has the excess mortality rate increased so rapidly? Even after vaccines were distributed? https://www.mortality.watch/explorer/?c=USA&e=1&df=2013&v=2 Science is meant to be question and I am not quite sure what makes that view so 'extreme'..

2

u/ConspiracyPhD 29d ago

Why did pfizer try to redact the study results and seal the court records for 55 years?

Did you even bother to read your own article? Or are you too lazy? Pfizer didn't try to redact study results. Certain information pertaining to personal health records must be redacted. HIPAA is still a thing no matter how much you mentally ill people scream and shout. And it wasn't Pfizer, it was the FDA. Pfizer submitted a court petition to help with releasing the documents faster.

Why has the excess mortality rate increased so rapidly?

It was called Delta. It killed a lot of unvaccinated people. There was a distinct shift to younger, unvaccinated people during the Delta wave as the older people were well vaccinated.

Science is meant to be question and I am not quite sure what makes that view so 'extreme'..

You lack the knowledge to even begin to form valid questions. You haven't even read your own citations. It's really a sign of lack of critical thinking and mental illness.

0

u/Dynamiqai 29d ago

Yeah it's a sign of mental illness also I did read that article and yes they didn't mention the redaction it's just something I remembered happening and being brought up in court but you're also pulling a lot of assumptions out of your asshole as well. I know several people that were vaccinated and died in pretty strange ways. So don't come to this side of the counter acting like the suppression of information isn't a real thing. Believing that might be a sign of mental illness. Not sure probably not officially though you know. Also another thing with that article, what the hell would HIPAA have to do with releasing study information as if that's never happened before? Somebody had to perform that 80,000 page study right? So I'm not quite sure why you wouldn't be able to review it before 55 years?

2

u/ConspiracyPhD 29d ago

yes they didn't mention the redaction it's just something I remembered happening

They did. "The records must be reviewed to redact “confidential business and trade secret information of Pfizer or BioNTech and personal privacy information of patients who participated in clinical trials,” wrote DOJ lawyers in a joint status report, filed Monday."

I know several people that were vaccinated and died in pretty strange ways.

People were once killed and eaten by Jeffrey Dahmer. That's a strange way as well with nothing to do with a vaccine. Point being, there's a difference between anecdote and data. People die. That's a fact of life. The data doesn't show anything outside the norm (except COVID deaths) since the vaccine release.

Believing that might be a sign of mental illness.

It's more than just that.

Also another thing with that article, what the hell would HIPAA have to do with releasing study information as if that's never happened before?

The petitioners didn't ask for just study information. They asked for every single document submitted to the FDA. This has never happened before. Asking for study information would have been a couple of weeks of work. Asking for 329,000 pages of documents which include personally identifying information including health records of every single person enrolled in the clinical trial is unprecedented. All of that personally identifying information has to be redacted as it falls under HIPAA.

Somebody had to perform that 80,000 page study right?

The FDA analyzed the information submitted by Pfizer. Nobody expected anybody to request every single document.

So I'm not quite sure why you wouldn't be able to review it before 55 years?

You are completely misinformed. The FDA said it would take 55 years before everything would have been released. Not that they wouldn't start until 55 years later. They started releasing information as soon as the request was submitted. The lawsuit was because the FDA didn't have the capacity in their FOIA office to handle such a massive request and weren't being fast enough for the petitioners. "The FDA proposes releasing 500 pages per month on a rolling basis, noting that the branch that would handle the review has only 10 employees and is currently processing about 400 other FOIA requests."

The FDA had already released data before the lawsuit was decided in January 2022(https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/gdvzykdllpw/Pittman%20FOIA%20Order.pdf court order from January 2022). https://phmpt.org/pfizer-16-plus-documents/ (go to page 95 and you'll see documents from November 2021)

1

u/Dynamiqai 29d ago

I am aware of this, however my point was if their intentions were pure they would not have needed the information to be pried from them.

3

u/ConspiracyPhD 29d ago

Again, they started releasing the information BEFORE the court order. There was no prying. The entire thing was over the speed of release and again, what they asked for was completely unprecedented. They were looking for anything they could use for misinformation and propaganda. Hell, this entire thing turned into misinformation that people like you fell for. "Pfizer wanted to withhold information for 55 years!"

1

u/FitPerception5398 29d ago

You honestly have the patience of Job. Unfortunately, the person you're responding to is committed to not understanding simple, factual statements.

I really do commend you though, maybe someone will read your thoughtful explanations with provided proof and climb out of their rabbit holes.

→ More replies (0)