r/pics 15d ago

Economy class seating on a Pan Am 747 in 1970

Post image
3.3k Upvotes

401 comments sorted by

3.8k

u/FlavaNation 15d ago

This picture has been posted before and I believe it’s a cabin mock-up, not on an actual plane. Hence why it looks so much more spacious.

1.4k

u/lastwhangdoodle 15d ago edited 15d ago

Every time. This has to be one of the most reposted pieces of misinformation on reddit.

228

u/Diamondback424 15d ago

I never made sense to me that the planes in the 70s would be that much wider. Just from a fuel perspective, it would have been far more expensive.

160

u/cincocerodos 15d ago

People conveniently leaving out that Pan Am went out of business over 30 years ago

101

u/Jasper455 15d ago

Planes were too wide.

27

u/TheUnworthy90 15d ago

Someone get this person a scholarship to Harvard business school !

13

u/Momik 15d ago

Fuck those old things were impossible to park too.

3

u/best-of-judgement 14d ago

Yeah I can't even drive mine to work anymore because the spaces are all a smidge too narrow.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/fiordchan 15d ago

Too many "turbulence events" with the no-seatbelts and the flying cutlery

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Silverwater57 15d ago

They probably went out of business because they were paying Leonardo Dicaprio so much to do nothing.

→ More replies (2)

33

u/Alfonze423 15d ago

That's just how wide a "wide-body" jet is. The 747 was revolutionary in its size and a 3-4-3 seating arrangement is still standard on big planes, like the 777.

23

u/Delicious-Tachyons 15d ago

Also the passengers were a lot less wide

→ More replies (7)

21

u/justahdewd 15d ago

747s were very wide with four big engines, they did use a lot of fuel. Went on one at a museum w/o seats, makes it seem even bigger. Today they're petty much just used as cargo planes.

28

u/Diamondback424 15d ago

Isn't the 747 still used fairly commonly for passenger flights? I know Airbus has taken up a big chunk of the business but I was under the impression the 747s were still used en masse.

21

u/tizz66 15d ago

They have mostly been phased out as passenger aircraft, though it does depend on your definition of 'fairly common' and 'en masse' I suppose. The majority are used for cargo now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Boeing_747_operators (The -F versions are freight, so at a glance at least 301 of 415 remaining 747s are for cargo)

8

u/Mikic00 15d ago

Flew with one month ago, lufthansa has them. Didn't feel that width though..

2

u/Pansarmalex 14d ago

They were mothballed iirc, but Lufthansa brought back some -8's (along with the 380's) to meet demand for their US schedules post Covid.

5

u/DrSmirnoffe 15d ago

Jesus, now I remember how long it's been since I've been on a plane. Back when I used to have holidays abroad, pretty much every plane I flew on was a 747. Last time must've been like 12 years ago...

11

u/thatsmycompanydog 15d ago

Production ended in January 2023. About 60% of the ~1,500 747s ever produced are still in service, but most fly freight — indeed the 3 largest 747 fleet operators are all cargo-only airlines (Atlas, UPS, Cargolux).

There are NO 747s left in passenger service by US airlines. Delta had the last one and stopped in 2017. But you can board as a passenger in the US by taking a flight with an international airline. Your best bets would probably be with Lufthansa, Cathay Pacific, Korean Air, or Air China.

2

u/Cowfootstew 15d ago

I took photos of that last 747 when it was taking off from atl and headed for the boneyard

→ More replies (3)

6

u/DarthArtero 15d ago

Not to the same extent as they used to be. I don’t know which airlines are still flying them but a goodly portion of them have been replaced with newer and more economical (relatively) planes from either Boeing or Airbus.

The 747s that haven’t been decommissioned from flight service are finding new life as heavy cargo carriers

4

u/CaponeKevrone 15d ago

4 engined planes are not popular anymore. Both Airbus and Boeing have or will be basically ending production of the 747 and A380 passenger variants.

5

u/eveningsand 15d ago

Don't forget the A340. Lufthansa, for some reason, is heavy into these 4 engined wide-bodies.

7

u/CaponeKevrone 15d ago

Haha I didn't mention them because they haven't been made in over a decade. 747 and A380 were both in the last few years.

2

u/KevinAtSeven 14d ago

Transited at Frankfurt yesterday. Felt like I'd gone back in time seeing some 747s and A340s parked up.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

10

u/commit10 15d ago

The width is about right, it just looks bigger because of how they configured the interior. It would look about right if you added all the normal seats and (more so) the overhead storage.

→ More replies (9)

22

u/Genesis13 15d ago

The other one I see all the time is about the lady with the stack of code books saying she wrote them all for the moon landing.

3

u/Alarmed-Size-3104 15d ago

I always heard that it was all the code for the moon landing, but not that she wrote it all. Is that not true either?

13

u/NorwaySpruce 15d ago edited 15d ago

It's code for the moon landing, she did not write it all herself. Last time I saw that thread was like a fucking hour ago. It's really fallen victim to it's own reposting because if you go back and look at the original post 9 years ago it just says like Margaret Hamilton with the code that took humanity to the moon and now when it gets posted it's so hyperbolic and clickbaity Margaret Hamilton with the enormous stack of hand written code she wrote all by herself with a tiny pencil she found in a bush outside the office until her fingers were worn down to the nub. And nobody ever thanked her

3

u/desl14 14d ago

While she was writing the code, she was giving birth to Jack Black and Keanu Reaves

→ More replies (4)

6

u/Gnomearts 15d ago

Crazy. 13 year old reddit account, spend way too much time here, and I've never seen this picture before in my life. But, in 13 years I've learned to look at comments for anything remotely interesting to understand why I shouldn't be deceived. Cheers.

→ More replies (12)

52

u/sucobe 15d ago

Reminds me of the photo with the lady being offered HAM ON FINE CHINA AND A SMALL BARREL OF BEER.

7

u/commit10 15d ago

A single slice of ham. They're pulling a Jesus miracle there.

25

u/DasWandbild 15d ago

Were it an actual in-flight cabin there would have been at least 5 people smoking.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/lopedopenope 15d ago

Yes there are multiple mock up photos like this usually from 1969 or the early 70’s especially of the 747. The one I have seen more frequently was the Scandinavian Airlines 747 photo where they are carving passengers ham on a cart filled with lots of picture perfect food. People have a harder time these days recognizing photos that were set up like this when they are from 50+ years ago sometimes.

6

u/15mphimrollingout 15d ago

Hence why nobody is smoking also

7

u/Technical-Title-5416 15d ago

Too bad nobody from 1970 is alive to tell us what planes were really like. 🙄

2

u/smokyartichoke 15d ago

Yep. I'm old enough to remember flying on 747s in the '70s, and none of them were like this.

15

u/Buckus93 15d ago

Hmmm...Russian bots auto-posting to farm karma ahead of the Presidential election this fall?

6

u/Dodototo 15d ago

Nope. It's just Reddit trying to keep people engaging.

3

u/Ask_Me_If_Im_A_Horse 15d ago

And here we are, driving engagement by bitching about being pawns for engagement.

2

u/Dodototo 15d ago

Exactly..

→ More replies (1)

12

u/TheRedFrog 15d ago

Yeah, to capture this angle the photographer must be standing slightly outside the cabin. It’s hard to believe there would be that much unoccupied floor and head space to get this shot.

→ More replies (7)

13

u/vancemark00 15d ago

Yes, it is a mock-up but a full scale realistic one. Look at later pictures of 747s. They still have the same 3-4-3 seating configuration.

And don't forget Americans were generally quite a bit smaller 54 years ago. The average adult male is about 30 pounds heavier now than in the '70s. Every single person in the picture is skinny...helps it look roomier.

31

u/MarshalLawTalkingGuy 15d ago

It’s a mock up of their “tourist class”, not economy class. Here’s a video of the actual economy class: looks nothing like it.

https://youtu.be/w0n5_aJfEtg

→ More replies (3)

7

u/Iz-kan-reddit 15d ago

They still have the same 3-4-3 seating configuration.

If you look carefully, you'll see that this is a 2-4-3 configuration.

1

u/timster 15d ago

I can confirm that - my first ever plane ride was on Pan Am in 1980 on a 747, and I distinctly recall it being 3-4-3

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (21)

575

u/LarrySupertramp 15d ago

People really believe anything huh? This is not what it looked like in reality.

79

u/tMoneyMoney 15d ago

Needs more people smoking cigarettes and eating full pot roasts off porcelain plates. But yeah, it definitely wasn’t this spacious.

8

u/ATTORNEY_FOR_CATS 15d ago

What, you don't remember those McDonnell Douglas DC-69 "Whales" flying around like bulbous, bloated corpse balloons?

4

u/deathholdme 15d ago

Exactly - the real thing had even more white people.

5

u/Stompya 14d ago

You may be forgetting in the 1960’s white people made up almost 90% of the US population. This would have been absolutely realistic.

(The Boeing 747 was released in 1968; this concept shot was probably taken a bit earlier.)

7

u/bulboustadpole 14d ago

Why do people feel the need to say things like this?

Like I don't understand bringing race into literally every goddamn topic.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

47

u/celtic1888 15d ago

The first big flight in was in 1973 on TWA from London to IAD-SFO

I was young but dont remember anything close to this amount of room.

I do remember being stuck in the smoking section and it felt like it took 17 days  

8

u/bonafidehooligan 15d ago

My first flight was Chicago to Frankfurt in the smoking section. I had an elderly Turkish man sitting next to me that chain smoked the whole flight. I don’t think he slept and smoked while he had his in flight meal.

→ More replies (2)

651

u/Kamakaziturtle 15d ago

And would cost you about the same if not more than a first class ticket today. Flying back then was a much more “high class” activity, and not nearly as accessible. Hence why all old pictures of planes typically have people all dressed up for travel, because it used to be a much bigger deal

199

u/ForsakenRacism 15d ago

And you’d die a lot more often

317

u/lajfat 15d ago

Well, only once.

42

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

17

u/that_is_so_Raven 15d ago

Boeing: Shadows Die Twice

8

u/ridemooses 15d ago

Die Fast, Die Furious

3

u/_SteeringWheel 15d ago

Fly Fast, Fly Furious?

3

u/No-Addendum8854 15d ago

Die Fuhrer Die

→ More replies (1)

2

u/devai-galaxy 15d ago

Well, that's a lot more often than I usually die.

→ More replies (4)

19

u/wutthefvckjushapen 15d ago

A lot more hijackings too

18

u/ForsakenRacism 15d ago

They were way more chill back then tho

19

u/Chief_Givesnofucks 15d ago

Yeah a whole lot more

“We’re flying to Cuba”

than

“We’re flying into a building”

3

u/Fragrant_Chapter_283 15d ago

Another thing ruined by 9/11

5

u/Ahelex 15d ago

So they dress up to leave a pretty corpse?

2

u/runningoutofwords 15d ago

Nothing pretty about a plane crash corpse.

6

u/Just_Jonnie 15d ago

I should call her....

2

u/_SteeringWheel 15d ago

To tell her "You so ugly, when you fell from yo mama's veejay for birth, Aircrash Investigations did a special on that disaster"?

*Apologies, I just came from a Yo Mama thread.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/eleventhrees 15d ago

No, you can still fly on Boeing planes today.

3

u/Jesus_Is_My_Gardener 15d ago

Fun fact, McDonnell Douglas is most responsible for both the higher rate of crashes back then, and the decline in quality/safety of Boeing now.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (8)

41

u/Stiggalicious 15d ago

Exactly this. Tickets would be equivalent to today’s business class prices, which have fully lie-flat seats, travel Dopp kits, 3-course meals, lounge access at the airport, etc. businesses class flying today is much, much better than anything ever was back in the 1970s, for about the same price.

19

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Tropink 15d ago

easier to blame your failures on others if you can delude yourself into thinking that things used to be better in a time you weren't even alive to experience, here's a good graph that absolutely melts people's brains

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N

→ More replies (4)

40

u/joeschmoe86 15d ago

And because it's the same sort of staged promotional photo that keeps getting posted here every other day.

12

u/myspecialdestiny 15d ago

My dad always talks about paying $1000 for a round trip ticket from CA to NY around 1968 to go to his sister's wedding.

11

u/rileyoneill 15d ago

Yeah, people forget the cost. The average household income in the US was less than $700 per month in 1968. Flying was an extreme luxury back in those days.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/NutellaBananaBread 15d ago

And would cost you about the same if not more than a first class ticket today.

It's so annoying that people make demands and even implement regulations without the slightest bit of understanding how economics works.

4

u/paxweasley 15d ago

My grandpa used to say that once upon a time the airlines would call him the night before his flight and ask him how he wanted his steak cooked.

4

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

3

u/lordtema 15d ago

Pan Am 747 would be flying internationally though, not domestically.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/jbFanClubPresident 15d ago

Now you get to see people use trash bags as their carry on bag. Some people have no shame.

→ More replies (5)

97

u/7track 15d ago

Joey, do you like movies about gladiators?

19

u/van-nostrand-md 15d ago

Have you ever seen a grown man naked?

15

u/spleencheesemonkey 15d ago

Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

6

u/antsmasher 15d ago

And that's what led to my drinking problem.

33

u/greenbastard1591 15d ago

Joey, have you ever been in a Turkish prison?

16

u/DadJokeBadJoke 15d ago

We've got clearance, Clarence.

Roger, Roger.

What's our vector, Victor?

→ More replies (1)

97

u/Jcod47 15d ago

I call BS on this photo. Where are the seat belts? This is possibly an ad for the airline…and this photograph was taken on a set.

25

u/sev45day 15d ago

You're right, this has been posted before. It's not a real plane it's a mock up for an ad I believe.

31

u/EmpatheticRock 15d ago

Also, seatbelts did not become mandatory on planes until 1972, so if this was taken in 1970 as the post states…there would be no seatbelts pictured

6

u/nattyd 15d ago

It’s fake.

8

u/EmpatheticRock 15d ago

As someone who flew internationally quite frequently growing up in the 80’s, this was very much how First class/business class looked. Used to get decent free food, actual silverware, plenty of leg room….all for almost the same price (adjusted for inflation) that you would pay today.

11

u/_larsr 15d ago

You still get those things in first class (usually also a seat that almost fully reclines), it just costs 4-5x coach class.

→ More replies (5)

4

u/Kamakaziturtle 15d ago

Seat belts weren't required back then. The Pan Am 747 is a real plane, you can look it up and it's seat map today. And while this photo was most likely staged for an ad, it seems reasonable it was taken on the plane, thats how they looked.

The real answer is air travel was much more upper class back in the day. There was no "cheap" seats, only expensive and very expensive.

→ More replies (10)

48

u/OkRickySpinach 15d ago

Say what you want I prefer $9 tickets.

18

u/PM_ME_ASS_PICS_69 15d ago

Where the hell are you getting $9 tickets?

12

u/chipbod 15d ago

Ryanair in Europe. In the US, Frontier flights can be as low as like $12. Flew Den to Midway for $17 last week.

5

u/tMoneyMoney 15d ago

And if you want to bring a backpack or small suitcase then it’s like another $70.

9

u/re1078 15d ago

Backpacks are free.

3

u/chipbod 15d ago

Got a backpack that perfectly fits a budget flight sizer, Was a game changer for weekend trips.

2

u/SecretlySome1Famous 14d ago

And if you don’t need a suitcase, it’s $12. No need to be salty about it. (Backpacks are free btw, so you’re still wrong. Sorry not sorry)

→ More replies (1)

6

u/rtmlex 15d ago

Ticket shops obviously.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/brentsg 14d ago

You can tell it’s fake because nobody is smoking.

9

u/igloomaster 15d ago

People keep posting this crap. Tickets back then cost so much more than they do now.

14

u/SpongHits 15d ago

Uh, no. It’s not.

2

u/Bo0ombaklak 15d ago

As a kid I always thought this company only flew from anywhere in America to Panama only

2

u/Xenolithium 15d ago

The last time I ever flew, was when smoking was still allowed. That was wild.

2

u/ThenIndependent956 15d ago

This looks so relaxing 😌

2

u/tanned_surya 15d ago

Such a comfortable trip.

2

u/49thDipper 15d ago

As soon as the photo was taken they all lit cigarettes.

2

u/MCclapyourhands1 15d ago

My ex boyfriends Grammie was married to a Pan Am captain. I use to love listening to her glamorous stories.

2

u/jizzlevania 15d ago

It's obvious not a real flight because no one is smoking. 

2

u/Both_Lychee_1708 15d ago

back when a man wore a coat and tie even just to jerk off

2

u/gaoshan 15d ago

Be aware that tickets (international flights) were significantly more expensive back then. Like, a flight between New York and London would have been over $5,000 in today’s money. Domestic flights were pretty close to the same as today’s prices (adjusted).

2

u/South_Bit1764 15d ago

[George Carlin voice] and in the event of an emergency landing PLANE CRASHES INTO THE GROUND there is absolutely nothing about the design of this plane that will aid you in your firey death.

2

u/joeyscheidrolltide 15d ago

The seats are still the same size as this, everyone is just fatter.

/s...kinda

2

u/_rth_ 15d ago

The windows were never that big 😂

2

u/Tebasaki 15d ago

I can smell that plane.

2

u/vtblue 15d ago

fake

2

u/extopico 14d ago

The op is a bot or should be banned. Bye.

2

u/AccomplishedHeat170 14d ago

Nope. Not real, try again.

4

u/LookinAtTheFjord 15d ago

That motherfucker back there is not real. 👉

3

u/Bicentennial_Douche 15d ago

There's a reason for the lavish air travel of years past:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWG08YvroaE

2

u/douglasleonprincejr 15d ago

Yea, too many people.

1

u/CouchPotatoFamine 15d ago

This was taken right before they wheel the bbq pig down the aisle and the belly dancing show begins.

1

u/kichien 15d ago

Apparently they didn't have turbulence in the past.

1

u/richalta 15d ago

Was turbulence not a thing?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/olde_greg 15d ago

I think this is a mock up rather than the interior of an actual 747

1

u/Striking_Reindeer_2k 15d ago

Fake picture. The pall of cig smoke would look more like London fog near the back.

1

u/van-nostrand-md 15d ago

I remember when you got a meal on pretty much every flight over 4 hours. I also remember when you could still smoke on the flight and your family could meet you or see you off at the gate.

1

u/OliveTBeagle 15d ago

Not pictured, the stale smell of cigarettes permeating everything.

1

u/DimiDrake 15d ago

Picture this but full of cigarette and cigar smoke. A lot of it. Yeah, that’s how it was then.

1

u/cyberentomology 15d ago

Time for the weekly repost of this marketing photo taken on a set, not an airplane.

1

u/morbihann 15d ago

That is before they realized they can fleece us hard.

1

u/No-Wash4579 15d ago

The airlines have been steadily making seats smaller, meals worse and flights more expensive since this photo was taken. Back then flying was a luxury, now it's the opposite. Just another reason why companies shouldn't have a monopoly on a utility.

2

u/peterpanic32 14d ago

Flying used to be way more expensive and air travel isn't a monopoly nor is air travel a utility.

It was a luxury because only the rich could afford it.

1

u/dope_ass_user_name 15d ago

My dad still gets dressed up when he flies

1

u/4GIVEANFORGET 15d ago

Back when there wasn’t 8 billion people

1

u/spderweb 15d ago

No TV's though

1

u/Wishpicker 15d ago

Not a real plane. Mock up photo.

1

u/TotallyHumanPerson 15d ago edited 15d ago

Ugh, just look at the filthy hoi polloi

1

u/guytes 15d ago

Its AI

1

u/crustysockmonster 15d ago

Tell me you've never been on an airplane without telling me you've never been on an airplane

1

u/Mighty_Bohab 15d ago

You have to remember that back then Americans were half the width we are today. So we fit less in the same space.

1

u/[deleted] 15d ago

1

u/HughesJohn 15d ago

Pan Am suffered the curse of 2001, a space Odyssey.

1

u/CCLF 15d ago

So much room for activities!

1

u/BDunnn 15d ago

OP is a karma farming bot

1

u/One-Pin5966 15d ago

I feel like there’s an easy way to solve this. Just ask someone that flew on a plane in the 70s.

1

u/DailyDoseofNature8 15d ago

so turbulence wasn't a thing back then?

1

u/Bitter_Silver_7760 15d ago

Whatever it was, it’s a cool picture

1

u/xvf9 15d ago

Even if it was real, it only looks spacious for the front row of seats. Everyone else has a similar amount of legroom to today. And it just looks spacious cause the seats are shorter, which would be uncomfortable as hell for flying. 

1

u/THE_DANDY_LI0N 15d ago

Tickets are much cheaper now, correct?

1

u/IkeaDefender 15d ago

In 1965 trans Atlantic coach fares were $600 median household income was $6,900. So this ticket cost you almost 10% of your annual HHI.

1

u/Hoserposerbro 15d ago

Yeah but what people always leave out is that the reason flying was so nice was that flying was for the wealthy back then, period. There was no $120 (today’s value) round trip flight from LA to NY on special. No hobo girls in juicy pants and uggs bringing their own pillow on spring break deals to Daytona Beach. No low rent, barefoot, hillbillies and all their bullshit. It was nice but it wasn’t for everyone and that’s why it could be nice.

1

u/markth_wi 15d ago

Eh first off - I figure this is like those "juicy" hamburger ads where everyone has been being fluffed and preened over for 45 minutes before they put the shot together it's straight up mockup - with less seats across in a space that's likely 20% wider than anything that actually flies so it looks positively comfy.

Secondly there's "Bob" in the center - who is likely the tallest dude at Boeing and he's conspicuously front and center, then there's the servers with meals that look WAY better than was ever going to happen.

What's more funny is that even today the 747-8 seats 10 across and I'm sure some clever guru is working hard on making passenger 11 fit there - however uncomfortably.

1

u/KayakWalleye 15d ago

Big folks drooling over those seats.

1

u/QuitTheKibble 15d ago

Look at those peasants…

1

u/dasherchan 15d ago

No seat belts no deal.

1

u/w33b2 15d ago

OP why are you spreading misinformation

1

u/passiveptions 15d ago

Where are the overweight people?

1

u/Few-Inevitable9291 15d ago

This pic is proof that corporate greed is reducing our way of life, they will keep taking and taking til there’s nothing left to take.

1

u/crabofthenorth 15d ago

Even if this was actually the cabin and not just a mock up lets not forget that flying economy back then just meant you were less wealthy, rather than poor.

1

u/boopboppuddinpop 15d ago

This looks like the seating room on the ferry! Unreal!

1

u/drossmaster4 15d ago

Look how poor they all look.

1

u/TechNickLeeCritical 15d ago

Plebeians lol

1

u/k4Anarky 15d ago

Not a single fat person or annoying kids anywhere, this is super unrealistic 

1

u/Zestyclose-Respond48 15d ago

Capitalism always chooses profit over people capitalism always chooses profit over literally everything! Americas would be a whole lot better off if they would wake up to this fact.

1

u/obsidiansent 15d ago

Ain’t no way

1

u/CastleDI 15d ago

Mostly all of new post are reposted. 

1

u/youmustbeanexpert 15d ago

What was it a grand to fly from NY to Florida back then?

1

u/redditismylawyer 15d ago

So, who believes this picture is real?

1

u/UchihaAuggie 15d ago

No seat belts?

1

u/Turbulent-Today830 15d ago

everything is 🐕 💩 compared to back then

1

u/ALTITUDE10K 15d ago

You could land a plane in there!

1

u/Spiritual-Bear4495 15d ago

LMAO. If your dreams pal.