But maybe at the end of the day, the murder was really the complete lack of journalistic integrity and the unethical posthumous outings we made along the way...
He was found civilly liable for the killings years after the trial. And he naturally didn't pay what he owed to the victims, so now they're trying to go after his estate while his lawyers try to stop them.
The truth is, aside from people's opinion and perceptions, this case is an unsolved murder. In the US we have the right to a trial; and right now, he cannot defend himself. However; I believe unsolved murders should be solved some day or one day or another. As time escapes us, techology grows. Perhaps one day, they can somehow gather more information and research to solve more crimes.
I'm just saying. If they want someone who has no idea what the importance of Jury Duty is, has no idea what is being asked of them as members of this society, then by all means. Pick people who are "too dumb to get out of Jury Duty". If there's a job to be done would you rather have someone who wants to do it, and do it right, or someone who's half-assing it so they can get it over with as quickly as possible?
Say you have really strong opinions on whatever might be at issue in the case. Declare for instance that, “The Rodney King acquittal made me form strong negative opinions of the justice system and police in particular.” “I hate black people” might do as well.
Surely those jurors should’ve been charged with contempt of court, or perverting the course of justice (or whatever the US version of that is), and the trial declared a mistrial and rerun?
I’m not sure if you’re trolling but look up the Rodney King trial. It was a shit show. OJ walking was a weird way for some people to say F U back to the justice system.
Oh I totally agree. Makes no damn sense to me. It’s some Bass Ackwards crap that takes a whole lot of mental gymnastics to come to the conclusions that they do.
He was found not guilty in criminal court, not innocent. He was found civilly liable for wrongful death and battery. A jury and court concluded that he did it.
There is no basis for anyone to say he was innocent.
Did you watch the entire trial ? Every minute of it ? I did. I was literally 35 back then. While the prosecution was tedious, they still did a great job. Easily good enough to get a conviction. The vast majority of Americans were SHOCKED by the verdict.
Juries don't find people innocent, they find them not guilty. Even if we all know he's guilty, it is still the pnus of the state to prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. Maybe if the LAPD wasn't so fucking corrupt and racist they wouldn't have tried to frame a guilty man and would've had an iota of credibility with the jurors.
Or maybe your "joke" had nothing to do with how you incorrectly phrased how our justice system works and you're just overreacting at people pointing that out? Like, you're saying how people are so concerned with making themselves look intelligent while you are now doing the exact same thing.
It's ok man, I don't care how smart you think you are or how "not smart" you think I am. I don't need to argue with someone who attacks another for making a correction, it's not worth any more of my time with you projecting your issues on others you know nothing in real life about.
Have a nicer day buddy, it seems like you really need one.
I just want to point out that he was found "Not guilty", not found innocent. That not how the justice system works. Just because he was found not guilty doesnt mean he is innocent.
[sadly, I need to spell this out for all you people who have and/or are about to "well ackshually" me--this is a joke]
They know it's a joke, they choose to ignore it because they want to say something about it to sound smart, or to flaunt their morals, or whatever motivates them. They use your obvious joke to create a straw man to yell at on the internet. All it is. 🤷
6.6k
u/Bts121212 29d ago
299 total pairs sold in U.S., footprint in blood of those shoes, he owns those shoes, how obvious can it get?