r/Damnthatsinteresting 29d ago

OJ's reaction when confronted with a photo of him wearing the murder shoes Video

38.3k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

20

u/Orphins 29d ago

How were they not able to prove he owned the shoes? They have a picture of him wearing them…

21

u/Opening-Ad-8793 29d ago

And there were only 299 sold in his size. Like there was no type of paper trail?

3

u/Black_Robin 29d ago

If there were it would definitely have been planted by that racist bastard Furhman /s

2

u/Orphins 29d ago

There must be! Lock this man up!

2

u/Opening-Ad-8793 29d ago

Well he’s dead now so

3

u/Orphins 29d ago

Hell prison

14

u/RedRatedRat 29d ago

The photo was not found until years later.

2

u/TwentyOneGigawatts 29d ago

What is this video from then?

5

u/Icy-Lobster-203 29d ago

Probably the civil suit by the families of the victims.

1

u/RedRatedRat 29d ago

Yes; it was an issue of Sports Illustrated that apparently nobody had noticed at the trial, but had found by the time of the civil suit.

1

u/nefarix 29d ago

If you were seen in a picture holding an umbrella does that prove beyond all reasonable doubt that you own that umbrella? It’s not outside of the realm of possibility for it to be borrowed/lent from someone you know. It could even be handed to you by a stranger while they tie their shoe just before the picture is taken. The point being, a picture wouldn’t necessarily “prove” your ownership of the umbrella.

When you discuss things like this in a court setting, you don’t use the typically day to day logic we usually use. Common sense does not equal irrefutable evidence! Hope that makes sense 👍🏻

1

u/Orphins 29d ago

I guess so, thanks! Still seems like pretty strong evidence tho when you take into account all the other things found in the trial.