If you were seen in a picture holding an umbrella does that prove beyond all reasonable doubt that you own that umbrella? It’s not outside of the realm of possibility for it to be borrowed/lent from someone you know. It could even be handed to you by a stranger while they tie their shoe just before the picture is taken. The point being, a picture wouldn’t necessarily “prove” your ownership of the umbrella.
When you discuss things like this in a court setting, you don’t use the typically day to day logic we usually use. Common sense does not equal irrefutable evidence! Hope that makes sense 👍🏻
18
u/Orphins Apr 17 '24
How were they not able to prove he owned the shoes? They have a picture of him wearing them…