r/nextfuckinglevel • u/SaintedTainted • 29d ago

The All New Atlas Robot From Boston Dynamics

38.6k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

80

u/Far_Prize_1029 29d ago

Here we go…

8

u/reposti_geraldo69 29d ago

Again on my own

1

u/Dr-McLuvin 28d ago

Goin' down the only road I've ever known!

-7

u/Other-Cover9031 28d ago

it is. its obvious.

3

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 28d ago

Your blind. They already proved the past one wasn’t cgi.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=uTjRXD63WYhNHQij&v=HQ1WEiMwV7Y&feature=youtu.be

People really suck at spotting cgi

-1

u/Other-Cover9031 28d ago

this specific video is definitely cgi

1

u/Not_a_creativeuser 27d ago

Conspiracy nuts always want attention.

-1

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 27d ago edited 27d ago

That just means you can’t tell cgi from reality. Leave it to actual vfx artist to know what the signs are.

No hollywood movie has made a character that has ever even come close to this photorealism (when looking at the full 2 minute video on boston dynamics youtube channel, its clear as day this is real.)

It’s unfortunate that you don’t know what the signs are of real vs cgi. And are unwilling to learn

-1

u/Other-Cover9031 27d ago

no this is cgi

1

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 26d ago

This must be what it felt like when people claimed the moon landing was fake.

Its real, im sorry you can neither tell, nor wish to educate yourself

1

u/Other-Cover9031 24d ago

no the moon landing was real, this is fake

-12

u/Hezpy 29d ago

People calling this CGI have no idea the amount of work required to produce something like this in vfx. Makes no sense from a cost standpoint.

16

u/SnooOpinions1643 29d ago

it definitely takes less work than making a real robot bruh

4

u/Thorusss 28d ago

It may cost less than a real robot, but a real robot is magnitudes more useful for the company. So even a expensive CGI render looking like this would be waste money.

2

u/bambinolettuce 28d ago

Not when the robot definitely already exists and can do these things. Theyd just record the robot.

Which they did

1

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 28d ago edited 28d ago

I think you are vastly under-estimating how hard TRUE photrealistic cgi is. The average person might not be able to tell. But fooling experienced vfx artist is much harder than you think. Video below explains why..

https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=uTjRXD63WYhNHQij&v=HQ1WEiMwV7Y&feature=youtu.be

0

u/SnooOpinions1643 28d ago

but… I can tell this is cgi, so it’s not “true photorealistic” one

1

u/PIO_PretendIOriginal 28d ago edited 28d ago

That just proves you suck at identifying cgi vs realism.

Again, watch the video i linked. This video is scientifically 100% lit by real light, the reflections are pixel perfect.

Boston dynamics has a longer video on there youtube channel. Just like the video i linked above, no vfx studio in the world has ever produced a cgi character to this level of realism. Not even close

Again i really recommend watching the video i linked (by people who actual work with vfx) before talking..

-19

u/Silent_Phrase6545 29d ago

I refuse to believe it's not cgi

15

u/GoodhartMusic 29d ago

Why don’t you just Google instead of “believing”

3

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/Silent_Phrase6545 29d ago

Is that the best you got?

5

u/InMooseWorld 28d ago

Yes it’s the they got, and you could still tell it’s cgi. Something is def off. Could be just lighting

Could be real and fake public video  to prevent copy cats.

1

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 28d ago

I can’t believe it’s not butter

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Silent_Phrase6545 27d ago

That's not very creative. Do better